GraniteShares vs iShares

A data-driven look at two weekly dividend ETF issuers. GraniteShares lists 33 weekly-paying ETFs averaging 54.1% distribution yield with $355.1M in combined assets, while iShares lists 2 averaging 3.6% with $823.6M. All figures are recalculated daily from the latest distributions and split-adjusted prices.

Key differences

  • Yield: GraniteShares pays the higher average distribution yield (54.1% vs 3.6%). Higher headline yield often comes with faster NAV erosion, so read it alongside price performance.
  • Scale: iShares manages more assets across its weekly lineup, which usually means tighter spreads and deeper options liquidity.
  • Cost: iShares is cheaper on average (0.20% vs 1.12%).
  • Breadth: GraniteShares covers more underlyings, giving you more ways to build a diversified weekly income sleeve.
Metric
GraniteShares
iShares
Fund count
33
2
Average yield
54.1%
3.6%
Average expense ratio
1.12%
0.20%
Total AUM
$355.1M
$823.6M

Structure, NAV protection and consistency

GraniteShares runs 33 weekly-paying funds with $355.1M in total assets; iShares runs 2 with $823.6M. The structural difference matters more than the fund count: a premium-pass-through lineup distributes what the option book actually earned that week, while a target-rate lineup such as Roundhill's WeeklyPay framework aims at a fixed weekly rate and adjusts leverage to hit it. The first gives you lumpy payouts with a cleaner NAV; the second gives you a smooth payout with more of the variability pushed into the share price.

On NAV protection, the average year-to-date price return is -40.7% across GraniteShares's funds and 0.1% across iShares's, so iShares has held its capital better on average this year. Because distributions are paid out of the same pool that supports the share price, that number is the single most useful check on whether a high headline yield is actually income or a partial return of your own money.

Who each suits: if you want the widest choice of underlyings and the deepest liquidity, the larger lineup is the practical default. If you are building a budget around a predictable weekly cheque, the target-rate structure is easier to plan against. Most investors are better served picking the specific fund on the underlying they want than committing to an issuer — start from the head-to-head pairs above, or the full rankings table. Nothing here is investment advice.

Frequently asked questions

Does GraniteShares or iShares pay a higher yield?

GraniteShares has the higher average distribution yield across its weekly lineup (54.1% vs 3.6%). Distribution yield is annualised from the most recent payout and is not guaranteed.

How many weekly dividend ETFs does each issuer run?

GraniteShares lists 33 and iShares lists 2 weekly-paying ETFs tracked by WeeklyYield.

Which issuer should I choose?

Compare at the fund level rather than the brand level — two ETFs on the same underlying can behave very differently. Use the head-to-head pairs above, and read our scoring methodology. This is information, not investment advice.